Buy on Amazon
£437.44
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 835 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 2% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 172 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 24 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD YD292XA8AFWOF 12 Core/24 Threads Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Processor
Buy for £437.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66798 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
85.40031397174255%
Multi-Core
3898
52.294070297826664%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
