Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Xeon E3-1290 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1914 days newer than Xeon E3-1290 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 87 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 7% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 249 vs 232 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 24 vs 8 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
249
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.27/FPS
100%
Price, £
£315
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
87 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |