Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1270 v3 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1270 v3 is 1530 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 85 vs 84 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 80 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
84
98%
Value, £/FPS
£3.75/FPS
100%
Price, £
£315
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |