Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Xeon E3-1230 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3635 days newer than Xeon E3-1230.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 18% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E3-1230 - 172 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1230 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1230 - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
172
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.77/FPS
100%
Price, £
£132.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £132.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4420 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1230 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |