Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms Xeon E3-1230 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 3635 days newer than Xeon E3-1230.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 28% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1230 - 118 vs 92 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1230 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1230 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1230 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
118
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.19/FPS
100%
Price, £
£140.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £140.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1230 | vs | Intel Core i5-11500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |