Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms Xeon E3-1220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 2102 days newer than Xeon E3-1220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E3-1220 - 233 vs 209 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 - 51 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
233
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£58.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £58.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |