Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 238 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 108 vs 105 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 24 vs 12 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
105
97%
Value, £/FPS
£5.99/FPS
100%
Price, £
£629.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £629.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18472 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |