Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Xeon E-2276M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1316 days newer than Xeon E-2276M.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 15% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E-2276M - 402 vs 351 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 32 vs 12 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
402
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£503.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £503.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19049 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |