Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2146G outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2146G is 336 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2146G
- Performs up to 5% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 177 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 80 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2146G - 24 vs 12 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
169
95%
Value, £/FPS
£1.6/FPS
100%
Price, £
£270.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £270.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jul 12th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2146G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |