Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Pentium P6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2510 days newer than Pentium P6100.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6100
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 353% better in League of Legends than Pentium P6100 - 154 vs 34 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6100 - 24 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
154
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.05/FPS
100%
Price, £
£315
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Arrandale | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |