Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Pentium G840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2691 days newer than Pentium G840.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G840
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 33% better in War Thunder than Pentium G840 - 172 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G840 - 24 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
172
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.49/FPS
100%
Price, £
£599.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £599.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G840 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
May 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |