Key Differences
In short — Pentium G640 outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G640 is 85 days older than FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-4130 - 118 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 4 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G640
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G640 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| Pentium | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
