Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1767 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 8% better in Resident Evil 4 than FX-4130 - 168 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 64 vs 4 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | EPYC |
| Zambezi | Codename | Naples |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
