Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2641 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than FX-4130 - 148 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Athlon |
| Zambezi | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
