Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2641 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 9% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-4130 - 163 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
163
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.37/FPS
100%
Price, £
£60
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Athlon |
Zambezi | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |