Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 827 days newer than Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Pentium G640 - 179 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 24 vs 2 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G640 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |