Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 851 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 201 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 140 vs 165 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
196
97.51243781094527%
Value, £/FPS
£0.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
76.99929228591648%
Multi-Core
3898
41.2836263503495%
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Skylake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |