Buy on Amazon
£49.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 1999 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than FX-6350 - 151 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 24 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 125 vs 165 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-6350 Black Edition CPU (AM3+, Hex Core, 3.90GHz, 14MB, 125W, Advanced Bit Manipulation)
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-9920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
