Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 945 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 29% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-10105F - 139 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - £69.38 vs £512.32
- Up to 83% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-14900KF - £0.64 vs £3.69 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
139
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.69/FPS
17%
Price, £
£512.32
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for £512.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
108
77%
Value, £/FPS
£0.64/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £69.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900KF | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |