Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £69.22 vs £514.35
- Up to 77% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i9-14900F - £0.59 vs £2.56 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 70% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i3-10105F - 201 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 32 vs 8 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
118
58%
Value, £/FPS
£0.59/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £69.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
201
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.56/FPS
23%
Price, £
£514.35
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for £514.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |