Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 945 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - £69.22 vs £512.32
- Up to 85% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i9-14900KF - £0.59 vs £3.82 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 15% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i3-10105F - 134 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 32 vs 8 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
117
87%
Value, £/FPS
£0.59/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £69.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
134
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.82/FPS
15%
Price, £
£512.32
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for £512.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |