Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 252 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - £69.38 vs £478.43
- Up to 85% better value when playing Uncharted: Legacy of Thieves than Ryzen 9 3900XT - £0.42 vs £2.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 1% better in Uncharted: Legacy of Thieves than Core i3-10105F - 166 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 24 vs 8 threads
Uncharted: Legacy of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
164
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.42/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £69.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
166
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.88/FPS
14%
Price, £
£478.43
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for £478.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |