Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2342 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Apex Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 304 vs 278 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £315.0 vs £514.33
- Up to 33% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i9-14900F - £1.13 vs £1.69 per FPS
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
304
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.69/FPS
66%
Price, £
£514.33
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for £514.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
278
91%
Value, £/FPS
£1.13/FPS
100%
Price, £
£315
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |