Buy on Amazon
£579.98
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $699
Availability
MSRP in USD: $699
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1795 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 26% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 5 2400G - 159 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - £175.0 vs £579.98
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel® Core™ i9-13900KS, 24 (8p+16e) Cores, 32 Threads, 32 MB Cache
Buy for £579.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74569 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Processor with Radeon Vega 11 Graphics - Wraith Stealth Cooler - YD2400C5FBBOX
Buy for £175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74570 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
1057
34.04186795491143%
Multi-Core
3294
15.08725324050749%
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
