Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 987 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 9% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i7-10700F - 239 vs 219 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - £214.12 vs £579.98
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £579.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74982 minutes ago
Buy for £214.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74983 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1612
51.91626409017714%
Multi-Core
7231
33.119589612055144%
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |