Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 278 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-14600KF - 151 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14600KF - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600KF
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - £269.0 vs £533.99
- Up to 49% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-13900KS - £1.82 vs £3.54 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
151
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.54/FPS
51%
Price, £
£533.99
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for £533.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
148
98%
Value, £/FPS
£1.82/FPS
100%
Price, £
£269
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £269 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i5-14600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 14 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
150 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |