Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 468 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-14400F - 222 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - £195.48 vs £465.99
- Up to 55% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-13900KF - £0.94 vs £2.1 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
222
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.1/FPS
44%
Price, £
£465.99
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for £465.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
208
93%
Value, £/FPS
£0.94/FPS
100%
Price, £
£195.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £195.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |