Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1042 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 27% better in Remnant II than Athlon 3000G - 105 vs 83 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - £60.0 vs £464.99
- Up to 84% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i9-13900KF - £0.72 vs £4.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
105
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.43/FPS
16%
Price, £
£464.99
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for £464.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
Buy for £60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Athlon |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |