Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1216 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 19% better in Overwatch 2 than Athlon 200GE - 394 vs 331 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - £86.0 vs £416.21
- Up to 75% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-12900F - £0.26 vs £1.06 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
394
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.06/FPS
24%
Price, £
£416.21
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for £416.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
Buy for £86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900F | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Athlon |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |