Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1482 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - £86.0 vs £465.88
- Up to 76% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-13900KF - £0.7 vs £2.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 34% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Athlon 200GE - 163 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 32 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for £86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
163
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.86/FPS
24%
Price, £
£465.88
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for £465.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |