Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 3319 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 15% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1610 - 288 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 99% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - £5.56 vs £403.96
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900 - 55 vs 65 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £403.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77205 minutes ago
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
17.22604124545087%
Multi-Core
739
5.665440049064704%
Intel Core i9-12900 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |