Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X3D is 3425 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 98% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X3D - £5.56 vs £309.0
- Up to 98% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 5800X3D - £0.06 vs £2.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
- Performs up to 33% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G1610 - 120 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3403 minutes ago
Buy for £309 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3403 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |