Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700K is 3025 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 98% cheaper than Core i7-11700K - £5.56 vs £235.0
- Up to 97% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i7-11700K - £0.04 vs £1.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700K
- Performs up to 24% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G1610 - 194 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
156
80%
Value, £/FPS
£0.04/FPS
100%
Price, £
£5.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10283 minutes ago
Buy for £235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10283 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-11700K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |