Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 4053 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 8700G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 18% better in Deathloop than Celeron G1610 - 198 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
15.860014892032762%
Multi-Core
739
5.1914295749912185%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8700G |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |