Buy on Amazon
£5.56
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7700K is 1492 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 97% cheaper than Core i7-7700K - £5.56 vs £198.88
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700K - 55 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Performs up to 9% better in HITMAN 3 than Celeron G1610 - 203 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
BQTEC Intel Celeron G1610 2.60 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 2 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processor LGA 1155
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75421 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-7700K 4.2 GHz QuadCore 8MB Cache Processor
Buy for £198.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75422 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-7700K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
27.116486314449396%
Multi-Core
739
14.476003917727716%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700K |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 91 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
