Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 3684 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 98% cheaper than Core i7-13700 - £5.56 vs £359.45
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 46% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G1610 - 156 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 24 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75691 minutes ago
Buy for £359.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75691 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
16.185410334346503%
Multi-Core
739
5.007114303137069%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |