Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4053 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 97% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - £5.56 vs £187.7
- Up to 95% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i5-14400F - £0.04 vs £0.88 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 39% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G1610 - 213 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
153
71%
Value, £/FPS
£0.04/FPS
100%
Price, £
£5.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10272 minutes ago
Buy for £187.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10272 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |