Buy on Amazon
£228.88
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $422
Availability
MSRP in USD: $422
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 49% better in HITMAN 2 than Celeron G3900 - 173 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - £25.15 vs £228.88
- Up to 83% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Core i9-11900F - £0.22 vs £1.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
173
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.32/FPS
16%
Price, £
£228.88
10%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-11900F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for £228.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
116
67%
Value, £/FPS
£0.22/FPS
100%
Price, £
£25.15
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz 2M Cache Dual-Core CPU Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 Tray
Buy for £25.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
