Buy on Amazon
£237.49
In Stock
Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 5 1600X: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.
2.8 GHz | 10-core
Buy for £237.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Buy for £178.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
2.8 GHz | 10-core
Buy for £237.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Buy for £178.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
MSRP in USD: $249
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1115 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
221
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.07/FPS
83%
Price, £
£237.49
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for £237.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
201
90%
Value, £/FPS
£0.89/FPS
100%
Price, £
£178.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £178.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.