Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 932 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 5% better in God of War than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 178 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i7-9700KF - £49.95 vs £379.99
- Up to 86% better value when playing God of War than Core i7-9700KF - £0.29 vs £2.13 per FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
178
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.13/FPS
13%
Price, £
£379.99
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for £379.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
170
95%
Value, £/FPS
£0.29/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700KF | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |