Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 316 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Athlon 3000G - 193 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-9700KF - £60.0 vs £379.99
- Up to 83% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-9700KF - £0.34 vs £1.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
193
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.97/FPS
17%
Price, £
£379.99
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for £379.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
Buy for £60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700KF | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Athlon |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |