Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 316 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Athlon 3000G - 180 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £300 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75071 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
56.59373151981077%
Multi-Core
1975
24.525021731031913%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |