Buy on Amazon
£99.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 832 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 7% better in War Thunder than Athlon 3000G - 166 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 24 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Processor - (12 Core/24 Threads) - YD192XA8AEWOF
Buy for £99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74455 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
81.51618398637139%
Multi-Core
1975
28.311353211009177%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Athlon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Picasso | Codename | Whitehaven |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
