Buy on Amazon
£60
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 1603 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - £60.0 vs £80.09
- Up to 20% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i7-6700 - £0.12 vs £0.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Tanks than Athlon 3000G - 530 vs 519 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD Athlon 3000G Processor with Radeon Vega 3 Graphics (2C/4T, 3.5 GHz Base Clock)
Buy for £60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-6700 3.40 GHz Quad-Core Octa-Thread 8 MB Cache 65 W CPU Processor LGA1151
Buy for £80.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Core i7-6700
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
| Athlon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
