Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Core i7-840QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2844 days newer than Core i7-840QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-840QM
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 45 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-840QM - 171 vs 166 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-840QM doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-840QM | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Clarksfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 54 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |