Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 1361 days older than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 2% better in Starfield than Core i3-9100F - 59 vs 58 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - £120.0 vs £243.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-6700K - £2.07 vs £4.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £243 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Buy for £120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |