Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2772 days newer than Core i7-620M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-620M - 234 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-620M - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-620M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Arrandale | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |