Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-4790K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-4790K is 1197 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790K
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 131 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £225.0 vs £315.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £1.72 vs £2.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 88 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4790K - 24 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
131
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.72/FPS
100%
Price, £
£225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4790K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
88 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |