Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - £79.51 vs £253.02
- Up to 66% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-10900F - £0.47 vs £1.4 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-4770 - 181 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i7-4770 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770 - 20 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
170
93%
Value, £/FPS
£0.47/FPS
100%
Price, £
£79.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £79.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.4/FPS
33%
Price, £
£253.02
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for £253.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4770 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |