Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i7-4600U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1460 days newer than Core i7-4600U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4600U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 7% better in World of Warcraft than Core i7-4600U - 178 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4600U - 16 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
178
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.92/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £163.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4600U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |