Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4600M outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4600M is 1675 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4600M
- Performs up to 14% better in War Thunder than Celeron G4900 - 158 vs 138 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 37 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i7-4600M
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4600M | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
37 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
